What Does The New Ohio License Look Like

[021] COMPETITION FOR PLANNING REPORT

Can partial plans to report technical architects, general, and the like?
Pere-Joan Torrent Riberto. Advocate

do not know if this is the big question, but if not, little is missing. If we talk about competition to write, first I must say that planning instruments are always reviewed by the municipal technical services, and the Autonomous Community, which is not about particular works projects, which are executed a simple municipal license, without being reviewed for technical content or constructive. It is therefore very different for the legislation and case law relevant to talk about how to draft planning tools, which qualified technicians for drafting projects. The latter affects the safety of citizens. In contrast, planning instruments, who the editor is less important that anyone who reviews it and approves it. Secondly I must say that in urban technical no exclusive competence, and says so repeatedly in the jurisprudence, it also argues that urbanism is a multidisciplinary field. Traditionally the architects' associations have argued that only have the power to draft planning instruments architects and civil engineers. However, this statement does not currently support either legal or jurisprudential. It is true that in the curricula of technical architects, at least for me I know a few years ago, were not matters relating to town planning, but this is changing fast, in the interest of the various professions in order to cover the work that may arise in the field of urbanism. So far, we have different occupations and careers outside the traditional, which affect the work of urbanism: geographers, environmentalists, engineers, etc ... If all the above refers to the issue of drafting planning instruments, it appears that remain to be much more open in regard to your question: CAN THE TECHNICAL ARCHITECTS, (I assume you're referring to the city) REPORT OF PLANNING INSTRUMENTS? My answer is: because their education in this regard is limited, I think that for a surveyor may exercise the role of information security planning tools, additional training should be about, or a proven experience, and I think the ideal would be to exercise this role under the supervision of an architect. Now, if they can or can not ever affect the legality of the adoption of planning instrument, could affect the municipal responsibility to entrust an important task to a staff unprepared for it.

As