There are several ways to tell the truth. Bertolt Brecht said that seven of the difficulties to say it and not only as determined in the courts: the dirty truth of the police, and dehumanized abstract truth of the judges who could be replaced by computers and programs "procedural logic." Very others are the ways in which they literature, and journalistic reportage, essay (the thesis without evidence), film, theater and political cartoon for possible approximation to the rough and uncomfortable truth. Neither Naranjo, and Rocha, and Ephrem, and the Voyeur, and Camacho, tests need to share their intuitive perception of things. Also the cartoon is presented as a theory without proof. It is his privilege. Right or wrong, but it soon picks up a suspicion of the collective soul. The imaginative writer not needed testing, but will have to strive in the art of persuasion. The only evidence is asking judges and police officers, evidence that other party may prepare and, in this country of all demons, are made very frequently. Everything can. Anything goes. Are collected evidence, not infrequently, just to avoid justice. However, continues to weigh on the work of the journalist or the historian, at least in theory, a minimum of legal culture that prevents forget the presumption of innocence, the right to a fair trial and the problem of proof. The truth has always been, from the Presocratics to Ludwig Wittgenstein, a philosophical problem at all easy. In our everyday life predominates tends dilemma between legal truth and "the real truth of things," as Machiavelli. And this is where the conflict "journalistic truth" that, with all its imperfections, not be separated from democratic politics. With all the risks involved, is vital in a country where bargaining is so much information and everything has constrained the standard so much so that you get to use the law as a perfect alibi. Suddenly, the mere mention of a name in a book-report of withdrawal may be an irreparable affront that affected not dare complain for fear that they will advertise to fib or because it's true. In such delicate margins have to move the journalist. Story books abound in names. "To all who are accused, with the exception of those mentioned in the text explicitly condemned definitively, is it clear that the presumption of innocence, a good that, as is known, is in defense of individual rights or is constitutionally guaranteed. "This paragraph appears on the first page of a remarkable journalistic research: Export Mafia, who has just published Anagram publisher. The book is the Italian Francesco Forgione and deals with contemporary globalization of crime. It would be nice that the books prefaced his report a warning text like Forgione: "The names are those that everyone can read the records of law enforcement and the judiciary, and are reproduced here just to name certain events and to reconstruct a overall picture and present, and not, of course, because they have to consider prejudicially guilty of the crimes which they deny. "judicial truth, therefore, for the courts to say whether to consider the accused - an explicit decision-innocent or guilty. The journalist must not confuse their profession with that of a judge or a policeman. It is neither one nor the other. http://periodismoimpreso.blogspot.com /
0 comments:
Post a Comment