The almagreños Fernando Moreno and Miguel Angel Chaves visited on Monday night the hall of the Municipality of Almagro in connection with the official reception Luis Maldonado, Mayor of Almagro, and Genaro Galán, Councillor for Sports, wanted to offer local karate recent winners of the Championship Karate Spain.
youth were accompanied by their coach, Luis Angel Chaves, who was also responsible for introducing their wards to relatives and friends filled the seats of the hall, before the mayor took the floor.
In his speech, the first thing Maldonado tried to do was to congratulate the families of the young champions, as in his own words "from the little ones have been channeling, and without your patience, effort and dedication, these successes would not now as possible. " Addressing
Fernando Moreno, Luis said "are no longer a promise, are a reality, and as ordinary almagreño assure you that I feel and we are full of praise for your achievements. "
also had words of praise for Miguel Angel Chaves and encouraged him to follow in the footsteps of peers such as Fernando, which are undoubtedly a landmark in his career, saying both are " a luxury for the city of Almagro ".
Fernando Moreno thanked his words and told how he lived the tournament, especially noting the breath of the public in the final battle that made him the second Castilian-Manchego achieves absolute gold medal in Karate Championship in Spain.
Miguel Angel Chavez acknowledged that merely being invited to participate in the tournament and was a success, and was the tension with which tasted each of the regional team battles.
Finally, Genaro Galán, who incidentally was at Royal City all weekend supporting almagreños with Emilio shoes, sports coordinator of the City, and had the honor of presenting the trophy to himself Fernando, told the new champion "must rely on your unlimited potential, and Almagro Flag walking across Spain, across Europe and around the World."
also gave praise to the work of Luis Angel Chaves sports coaching and human children and used the occasion to announce that the City purchase a new mat to practice a sport gaining adherents every day in Almagro.
Almagro of Spain fortieth second Karate Championship Senior.
Most English Karate activity concentrated in Ciudad Real, over the past four days, from 24 to 27 March this 2011.
began with the course of arbitration, which breaks a year and a positive statistic, and increase the number of new candidates for judges and arbitrators, a total that exceeded twenties. With a total attendance that exceeded the number of eighty national arbitrators in that course, little that is new and where the current regulation remains in force, with the long-awaited change that much has been said, is a new system for next year supposedly. Thus predicted and that next year, will expand even more participation in the national course of arbitration.
From these lines to congratulate the national commission for their work, which I know has been much more than expected. The competition is based on competitors, but without good referees decay competition.
Participation in a championship Spain is much more that the act of participating, the winner gets more than a trophy, also a "Title " because it gives you a title valid for one year and the winner gets the title champion Spain to the next dedición.
The English karate is too obsessed with these " titles," which means that each issue be harder, if possible, than before. What began as an amateur championship for many years, has become a professional sport and competition, athletes in training and specialization courses its large majority in a discipline (mostly Kumite), not to mention a few skills that lead them to be all the evidence. If and I mean in all, I think few of these, very few karateka who are in all rounds of the championship. When I say all I mean a karateka who is in a whole championship in Spain, participating in team kumite, and individual, team and individual kata, and also before the Open. Now a total of four tests, that is the karateka Toledo July Cuadra, and to my knowledge, is the only thing that makes this feat today.
Being umpiring could see little that was not concerning my tatami and each tatami have some categories and some money, that even a senior competition is very different from each other. The weights, say much because there weights are very fast and have to be very visual acuity in the +84 kg weight, the fight is usually slower. I am referring to a meeting of -75 +84 kilos to one of kilos, mobility and transport as well as actions can be duplicated in the lighter, very easily.
Saturday began with teams of kumite, where in other mat Castilla-La Mancha and Madrid were beating on their opponents and reaching the final, if it last year 2010, Castilla-La Mancha was a success to be 3, for the first time in the history of karate manchego, in this form of kumite teams, this year has been a landmark . That, as it reflects the language academy is " united immediately", I still remember the words of the regional coach Antonio Paniagua, last year, we could have gotten into the final!. As the fate would have it be in our lands of La Mancha where he wrote this quest.
I can not talk of the encounters because the only thing I could see was the final and lost by 3-0 to the almighty Madrid. In on 1 match against Fernando Badas lost, 2 and Raul missed a 3 that missed Álvaro Carmona. This is the first time you reach the end, the story does not end here, otherwise it continues. The podium of equipment that are unambiguous and Madrid and Basque, year after year, and there are already several years in a row ... this year, others have been back the Basques and La Rioja, is last, and not surprised to win the bronze if not, the good team that has been set.
Fernando Moreno, Julio Cuadra, Alvaro Jimenez, Adrian San Jose, Jesus Aparicio, Miguel Chaves, Raul Ramos.
In quipos female kumite, a hard-fought final between Catalonia and the Balearic Islands, where the Balearic resisted very well, three competitors, two are almost certain assets and Catalan only one, and the dispute was adjusted to the end. Champion in this category Baleares and Catalonia, which resisted very well, making a very good end, and especially close.
teams in men's kata, Madrid much higher in the final against Cantabria, a 5-0 clear. I would have liked to see that hypothetical Madrid-Valencia ... but could not be, will be a year of these to make sure. Valencia had to settle for bronze, next to La Rioja. Where there is already to say, La Rioja has been the federation "revelation" of this issue, one more bronze.
In women's team kata, the kata again Shitoryu to power four medals, three for new Shitoryu style, gold and silver, plus a bronze. Madrid and Valencia reached the final, where Madrid beat Valencia, the Canaries and Galicia third, Galicia is up with drive through a broad commitment to young people.
Here is a picture of the performance of Castilla-León, which shows a little deviation in the team, and one of the Unsu Bunkai.
individual in karate, I believe have stood out for various reasons. A aroused much excitement in karate manchego, Yaiza Martin , its strength and dominance in the category solo kata which was 1 st, but surprised many when they saw the protections of Kumite, many did not assume that was the same and where again won a medal for the Valencian federation being third. As one more of those rare "multi-purpose karate, which I just missed being in the team kumite, in order to match with Julio Cuadra participation in each and every one of the tests allowed.
As karateka style Shotokan in individual kata appoint Leon Castilian Belén Martínez, could only be third, but is the only non-Shitoryu the podium. Yaiza and Sonia García who contested the final, and a third Fatima Acuña de Canarias, which was less than, and won the Castilian Mancha, Sandra Sanchez in the race for the bronze. La Mancha made a brilliant tournament, most notably the best.
kata Sandra Sanchez running against Fatima Acuña.
kata in the final of men, is again the same as the previous year, changing the order of factors is ie by changing Aka Ao, and the same result with the former 4-1, to Aka. This year he Damian Hugo Fernando Quintero of San Jose Aka and Ao, and the same kata as last year, Suparinpei. Appoint the other party, as in females, are exceptional young José Manuel Carbonell, now rubs shoulders with you to you, with the largest and Marcos Valentine, another who is a regular at the podiums.
San José Adrián 3 rd in the championship of Spain.
in individual kumite is to miss six tatami working, so I will appoint those who can, the La Mancha were going a few rounds and in many there was hope, which some continued and others fell, but in these, the fight that came into play-offs continued to fight particular for being on the podium, and fell to last pass, but he got there and got Raul Ramos Duenas that solo medal in kumite -84 kg, shortly after San Jose would be Adrian + 84 kg, well this karateka manchego and the nickname of "the salt Castilla-La Mancha ", since it takes a few years it decides in the end the direction of the team, so that this individual also on the podium is an added bonus and well deserved.
A final apotheosis, some said that my association with La Mancha, I dunno, but the end of Fernando Moreno Paz Madrid the great champion Antonio Sanchez Estepa in kumite -75 kg, which for me, was the best finish, that reminds me that " victories against big more victories." A meeting to four minutes, Fernando and Antonio took the center where the Spaniard went ahead with a cuff technique, Fernando was in the middle, Antonio Fernando tried turning over and over again chudan technique for Antonio 2-0, was still long time, almost two minutes and Fernando began to be the attacker, Antonio real professional on hold with a minimum lead to the end, two points could be expected to maintain this difference, but time was short, and it became very difficult to Fernando, Antonio slipped very well and not let anyone catch anywhere, the manchego intensified and spent time ... less than six seconds from the end at last got a Ura mawashi jodan, which gave him a 2-3, the discount begin that six seconds, Antonio went for it, but virtually no time to react. Intense combat and very good it was a gold for the host federation.
Fernando told me after the meeting that half of this victory is due also to his brother Alberto Moreno, with whom he practiced daily, and who else has had to endure his shots ... well nothing congratulations to both.
& Alberto Fernando, during their workouts.
Speaking to the media , Fernando explained that "it was very hard, but the key was that when he went 2-0 down I got nervous. I knew I just needed a kick in the head for three points and held my quite calmly. "
Another intense battle was to Oscar Martinez of Quel, beat the Spaniard Adrian Lueje, with a difference of eight points.
The last final arbitrated by the referee manchego Francisco José Carretero between the two Madrid Ricardo Javier Barbero and Badas, finally giving champion Ricardo. Both are components of the regional team in Madrid. Kumite female
In addition to what has already been discussed in Yaiza, a fireproof Natalia Garcia Suarez of Cantabria, who won a closely contested matches Lara Lamb with Canary, a champion Natalia year in Spain, magnificent champion.
Balearic Islands in the final two, one in -68 kg and the other in -61 kg. Irene Colomar Costa won the Madrid Marta Parrilla and Cristina Ferrer García to Madrid also Stephanie Martinez. Two golds and two silvers for Balearic more to Madrid.
Combat Marta Irene Colomar & Grill.
This championship has left a medal, where the President of Castilla-La Mancha Don Javier Pineño, estimated that we would be among the top eight, and if we are "seventh" comtartiendo box or sixth, because we are level on Canary medals Madrid is established as an absolute winner with three gold, eight silver (making a total of nine observations) and seven bronzes for a total of eighteen medals at four of his nearest rival federation Balearic third Valencia, Andalusia and La Rioja fifth quarter (advance four places from last year), "sixth" and equal to medals in the box, Canary Islands and Castilla-La Mancha with an identical result ( one gold, one silver and two bronze). Castilla-La Mancha, which last year was the tenth second to advance well, almost six posts ...
the opening ceremony in the sports council and the presidents of Spain, Don Antonio Moreno and Castilla-La Mancha, Don Javier Pineño be flattered with commemorative details.
The show on Saturday afternoon, several activities took place, a massive participation of young karateka Ciudad, by clubs, Ciudad Real and Fitness Shotokan Bunkai. An exhibition of Tai-jitsu and then ample demonstration of Kobudo, by the maestro José Miguel Gómez Calderat and a large group of students. Surprise championship in these competitions you can meet people, now barely remember, but because the karate and the championship is on our land, you could easily find old friends, or old competitors, like it was. Some and some came to greet me and sometimes I went to greet them.
But I was expecting an old master, my second teacher . Hugo Alvarez Angles, who was as surprised as me to see him here, because I knew who was in Peru. But it has come to Spain to try and make technical exchanges between Spain and Peru.
I do not forget, if not, keep it to the end. emotional tribute to Don Alberto Aragón Cotillas for their commitment to arbitration, but as you said the President of the Royal English Federation of Karate, Antonio Moreno Marqueño, word of which I agree, one by one and some more ... and Alberto was the person who helped us in the arbitration and who were attending to clarify any doubts, almost all new contender for years and always had time to explain or give us your idea on the issue raised. I loved his explanation of the kata competitive which is quite an eminence. Act
filled of emotions, mainly of the honoree, after all those who admire him for his lengthy career, his worth and his cherished friendship.
came to these lands of La Mancha, Ciudad Real precisely, as a technician and teacher of Karate and teach courses on everything from higher Katas Shito-ryu. His knowledge of kata I have never ceased to surprise. So I've learned a lot from him, arbitration and kata, but also and mainly of camaraderie. My friend
THANKS for your help, your teachings , and above all trust and your friendship. What if I were to value one by one, each and separately, would not know which to put first. A STRONG HUG.
I wonder if it has issued a Supreme Court ruling to clarify the scope of the LOE as to what is meant by "building" for purposes of implementation of the LOE own (need project, participating agents ,...) and Technical Code "Building" (when it comes to technical aspects).
I would also like to know if, once repealed by the large CTE Most of the previous legislation, that legislation would be regulated according to what the LOE, is not considered "building." Pere-Joan Torrent Riberto. Advocate 1. I know of no Supreme Court ruling to clarify the scope of the LOE as to what is understood by construction. I do not think there is another way to go to Articles 2 and 3 of the LOE to know the scope of the LOE and hence of the Technical Building Code.
2. The CTE gives no definition of what is considered a building or a building. Part of the basis that everyone agrees and knows that is a building.
3. For its part, the LOE when defining "building process" falls into vice or defect of tautology, that is to give a definition defined. That tells us that the building process is to build a permanent building, public or private, whose primary use is ... a) ... b) ... c) or any application.
4. Given this lack of precision of legal standards, we have no choice but to go to the English Language Dictionary lal of the SAR, which tells us: BUILDING (Latin aedificium): work or factory built for habitation or for similar uses, such as home, church, theater, etc.. Dictionaries in other Romance languages \u200b\u200bof our country, come to the same thing.
5. All works that is not considered building according to the LOE, are governed by specific technical rules that exist on that type of work if it exists, such as highways, roads, ports, dams, infrastructure works, parks , garden, electrical, etc ... If it is a work that has no specific technical regulations, shall be constructed in accordance with technical standards that provide adequate security for use, as the science of construction applicable to each case.
Anyway, what worries me most municipal coaching regarding what should be regarded as "building" is anything that relates to the entries b) and c) of paragraph 2 of Article 2 of the LOE because I understand that the definitions are made for works that are not new plant are out of consideration of "building" many works, which, consequently, neither should apply to the LOE, nor the Code Technical Building or rules which have governed. A few examples: * The replacement
a whole floor of a residential building, including the cast, to be redistributed in a different number of homes while continuing to use.
* The installation of an elevator in a building including demolition and alterations to the staircase.
* Reform or complete installation of any commercial premises belonging to a residential building (ie, whose characteristic use is residential).
These works are not works of "building" under Article 2.2.b) of the LOE do not alter the architectural configuration of the buildings to which they belong and that:
- not an intervention total (what's that ?)
- not produce a substantial variation (What is this?) Outside the general composition, or the volumes or the entire structural system.
- Do not aim at changing the characteristic use of the building (what is this?).
The direct consequence is derived from reading the LOE be made that these works, despite their clear impact on structural safety, fire protection, use, or accessibility ... not need technical project or agents involved in them, nor would they meet technical rules since the CTE has repealed almost all of the above.
Is this correct? Nobody has raised this circumstance? Has anyone used this way when in the processing of the relevant licenses have been required for these works to comply with certain requirements under the CTE or the intervention of a particular product? Pere-Joan Torrent Riberto. Advocate 1. The commentator is right that the wording of Article 2.2.b) ic) of the Law on Building could be interpreted in the sense that it has. But the reality is usually not done, and I think that an interpretation in this sense would not be accepted by case law.
2. The 3 examples of works that require project relates undoubtedly, because they are major works require planning permission and that no municipality without a project grant signed by a competent technician. The 1 st piece of the speaker (replacement of an entire floor of an apartment building) requires a technical project, and forcibly signed by an architect, being an exclusive competence of architects. The 2 work requires a technical project frozen, which may be signed by various technicians, by use of the building where the lift is installed qual. Of course if it is a building for one of the six purposes only architects, project must be signed by an architect. If you're a commercial or industrial building project may be signed by competent engineers. But inevitably the installation of an elevator requires a technical project. On the 3 rd work (reform or complete installation of a shop) is not easy to decide because it works very indeterminate.
3. Leaving aside the ambiguity of Article 2 of the LOE, we refer to Article 2 of the CTE which has a different tone in his writing. Start by saying that the CTE should apply to all works that require a municipal license, under the terms determined by the LOE. And paragraph 3 of Article 2 includes the extension works, modification, alteration or rehabilitation without using the concepts prescribed in Article 2 of the LOE.
4. As regards the last two paragraphs of explanation, my view is that these works require technical project, and other agents of the building that provides for the LOE. And I know of cases where the owner of a work of this nature need not have alleged the project, but may have existed. And it would seem foolhardy to give a municipality licenses for such works without a project signed by a competent technician, and without proper site management and direction of execution of the work, if this is appropriate. As regards the implementation of the CTE, it will be required, with the exceptions that the CTE itself for change and reform works.
In a city of Catalonia, we have applied a horizontal division of a registered property that does not meet minimum farm rural (2-ha agricultural area), with the peculiarity that said property are two vivendas separated by a public road. Not have the final approval Masías catalog, which is in process and recognizes the two vivendas: as a house and the other as a country house. Can you grant a license division horizontal according to art. 50.3 of Decree 1 / 2010 and Regulation 238 of the Planning Act? Or on the other hand, we have previously passed the catalog.
Balance of contribution in terms of housing savings
One of the requirements of legal regulations in housing is the Proof of enrollment in Savings Fund for Housing (faov), being active and lows have twelve consecutive or not. For the Statement, the applicant requested before the Banavih that document. To do this you must present your identity card number or send a person with authorization and copy of identity card. The statement will reflect the contributions made on or after October 6, 2009, the date from which the Banavih centralized information. For quotes prior to this date, the applicant must request information in the bank where he deposited the housing savings. Onsite Banavih has no offices nationwide, working at its headquarters in El Rosal, Caracas.
a lawyer I am owning a home in Granollers. In 2008 the architect certified the final certificate of work, but in 2010 returned to endorse another Certificate of Completion (in respect of the same works) plus parking. It is fragrant indicating, at 2 º to cancel the previous certificate VISA 1. What final completion certificate must be taken into account for purposes of computing time warranty? 2. What are the consequences revoke a certificate of Completion? 3. Do they return to run the warranty period with the new certificate? Pere-Joan Torrent Riberto. Advocate Answer questions in the order in which they are made. 1. It should be noted the second certificate of Completion, as according to the architect has issued two certificates, the second cancels the previous certificate. 2. For me it has the consequence that the final certificate annulled first work, ceases to have legal effect. 3. I think certainly, if it has canceled the first final certificate of work, this means that the only valid one is the second, and therefore return the warranty period to run from the date of the new and second final completion certificate.
Certificate of Completion [016] AN EMERGENCY EXIT GREEN
work as municipal architect in Catalonia, and I wonder if in a supermarket might want to open the emergency exit evacuation through a green area that borders directly on the building. Of course not, but I do not know if a good enough argument that is not a permitted use in green areas. There any statement about it? Pere-Joan Torrent Riberto. Advocate is true that the normal use of a public green area is to be a free space for use by local residents. But neither seems to be a prohibited or contrary to its purpose, which can be used to exit a room or business. In fact, the emergency use occurs rarely in many years, so not to undermine the purpose of the green. The same can be said about a park is not closed to the public, or any free space. Therefore, I consider that the Council can authorize the emergency exit which adjoins or faces a green area. I know of no decision in this regard. There are sentences that prohibit a green area ends up being a parking lot, which happens frequently. And it seems logical to prohibit the use of parking in the green, because it is an application that undermine its purpose. On the other hand, some housing blocks access road through a green area by a pedestrian. If this happens frequently, it seems more so we can authorize an emergency exit through a green area.
work as municipal architect in a city of Castilla-La Mancha and reports for granting planning permission do I need special consideration to the conditions for energy conservation projects including (Article 166 of TRLOTAU of C-LM). on the market are emerging systems that use a wide range of renewable energies (biomass, geothermal, aerothermy, mixed systems, ...) of dubious efficacy and performance in some cases, while very attractive to developers because of its lower cost compared to solar energy. How I can consider that an alternative system to solar energy requirements of a project is the energy from hot water required by the CTE as provided in section 1.1.2 a) Section HE 4 HE DB Energy Savings? How far do the work and responsibility of the municipal technical and the technical editor of the project in this regard? Pere-Joan Torrent Riberto. Advocate 1. I do not know the wording of Article 166 of the Management Act of the Territory of Castilla-La Mancha. This is a small problem a result of urban autonomous laws be 19 plus 1 state. But I guess the only thing to establish is the requirement that homes have a supply of hot water from renewable energy, alternative to traditional electricity or gas. More or less should say something. I do not think that establishes the obligation of the solar panels, because in this case because there would be no alternatives. 2. If Article 166 of the Labor says something similar to what I suppose, your responsibility as coach municipal, reporting building permits, it merely states that the project contains a system for using renewable energy for hot water. If the bill contains this provision, your job is completed to verify this, and can report favorably on the project. 3. If your law requires renewable energy are solar panels, your job will require this system. If you allow alternative systems, your report may be favorable if the technical author of this project an alternative system. 4. You have no obligation as a technical bulletin, to ascertain if the proposed alternative system is effective or whether it will be more efficient than solar energy. And if you do not have this obligation, means that it does not have responsibility. I think this should be clear. If the project is a solution to renewable energy for hot water, and this is what is required by law in your community, your job and your responsibility ends in finding that the project has a particular solution, without considering the goodness of same. 5. It goes without saying that all the responsibility that you do not have to verify that the proposed solution is correct, this responsibility belongs to the technical editor of the project, notwithstanding that it may also correspond to the promoter of housing, whether it is for later sale.
